The breadth of worldview cannot be the breadth of attitude (?)

We cannot simultaneously believe in opposite things; perhaps in life, we still lean towards one of them, although due to the breadth of our views, we may leave cognitive space for new ideas.

But leaving space and believing are not the same thing.

It's more like not just believing, but being so convinced that one naturally lives in accordance with that idea. The relationship to a certain thing already exists, and we can easily act against this relationship, but then we will encounter the same natural resistance.

This same attitude, conviction, belief (perhaps a better word can be found) influences life in and of itself, without the need to persuade anyone.

It does not test the beauty of thoughts or the truth of views; it is the truth itself that leads a person in every specific moment.

Knowing your own truths is not at all necessary, but knowledge of them makes life periodically a bit clearer.

At the same time, we cannot deny the experience of paradox, in which opposing truths clash as equals, thus leaving us in absolute ignorance.

But this experience is hard to endure for a long time, and even more difficult to apply practically.

And life forces us, one way or another, to choose something, to stop at something. To cut something off and lose something. And to acquire, of course.